Humans naturally debate as to what they want, it matters how much people care. If one person disagrees with the whole they are a statistical anamoly and should be ignored. You said no voting, leaving us with just shouting at one another untill our group had the idea to send someone forward. Go us. I'm a scientist, not a sociologist. Im in this class to learn. Woo for free writting but this is so damn, yes damn, difficult because you gave us nothing to go off of and changed the rules every time we started. I am quite fed up with this process and I think it is unfair to us as students to have to make every one happy.
Im fustrated with you, Dr. Jhonson, and the one blond girl who wouldnt agree to anything we said.
Teachers cant make everyone happy, it is imposible, yes IMPOSSIBLE, to make everyone in this class happy with a single decision. And YOU said that if someone disagrees to speak up. Well that means there are 40 odd people to make happy, where 30% dont give a damn, 10% want an honest grade and 60% are here because they have to be and need that A for a good Gpa. Im all for participation, but there have to be guidlines. You cant throw a person into a new envierment and expect them to survive without any guidelines. This is just a failed experiment and shows why we need a teahcer. Basically when Tai went up she did your job, a sort of speaker of the house or authority figure that was needed to make any progress as I talked about earlier. I'm sorry for getting so upset over this but this class set up is going past involving the students and borderlining rediculous.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment